A Modal Logic for Coalitional Power in Games
نویسنده
چکیده
We present a modal logic for reasoning about what groups of agents can bring about by collective action. Given a set of states, we introduce game frames which associate with every state a strategic game among the agents. Game frames are essentially extensive games of perfect information with simultaneous actions, where every action profile is associated with a new state, the outcome of the game. A coalition of players is effective for a set of states in a game if the coalition can guarantee the outcome of the game to lie in . We propose a modal logic (Coalition Logic) to formalize reasoning about effectivity in game frames, where expresses that coalition is effective for . An axiomatization is presented and completeness proved. Coalition Logic provides a unifying game-theoretic view of modal logic: Since nondeterministic processes and extensive games without parallel moves emerge as particular instances of game frames, normal and non-normal modal logics correspond to 1and 2-player versions of Coalition Logic. The satisfiability problem for Coalition Logic is shown to be PSPACE-complete.
منابع مشابه
Coalitional Public Announcement Games
Dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) is a popular framework for studying interaction in multi-agent systems. DELs describe the actions available to the agents, and their epistemic preand post-conditions. By extending standard epistemic models with preferences over epistemic states, we can say something about rational behaviour as well, combining logic and game theory. In this paper we assume that pref...
متن کاملExpressivity and Complexity of Reasoning about Coalitional Interaction: Extended Abstract
This paper studies expressivity and complexity of normal modal logics for reasoning about coalitional power in multi-agent systems with agents that have preferences. A class of local and global notions relevant for reasoning about cooperation is identified. Many of these notions naturally correspond to concepts from game theory or social choice theory. The expressive power required to express t...
متن کاملLogics for Qualitative Coalitional Games
Qualitative Coalitional Games (QCGs) are a variant of coalitional games in which an agent’s desires are represented as goals that are either satisfied or unsatisfied, and each choice available to a coalition is a set of goals, which would be jointly satisfied if the coalition made that choice. A coalition in a QCG will typically form in order to bring about a set of goals that will satisfy all ...
متن کاملExtended Modal Logics for Social Software
This is a short motivational report on work that we have done in two specific areas of Social Software, i.e. Coalitional Games and Judgement Aggregation. We argue that Extended Modal Logics prove to be particularly successful in the modeling and axiomatisation of reasoning problems in those areas. Here, we restrict ourselves to a description of the domains: technical details are to be found in ...
متن کاملCoalitional Ability in Multi-Agent Systems: A Logical Approac
Effectivity frames are introduced as a model of ability in multi-agent systems, i.e. of what groups of agents can achieve by coordinated action in dynamic processes such as extensive games with or without simultaneous moves. Local effectivity is distinguished from different kinds of global and terminal effectivity, respectively what groups of players can maintain throughout and what they can ac...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Log. Comput.
دوره 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002